Giving presentations (Advanced)

C2
90 min
Premium
1

Think about these questions before reading. Share your ideas with a partner.

  1. Reflect on the most compelling presentation or speech you've ever witnessed. To what extent was its power derived from the speaker's charisma versus the meticulous construction of their argument?
  2. When presenting to a skeptical or even hostile audience, what rhetorical strategies, beyond simply presenting facts, might a speaker employ to win them over or at least command their respect?
  3. In an era that values authenticity, where is the line between employing sophisticated rhetorical devices for persuasive effect and coming across as manipulative or disingenuous?
2

Handling a Tough Q&A

Listen to the dialogue. Notice how the vocabulary and grammar from the lesson are used.

3

Key vocabulary for persuasive speaking

Vocabulary
The following expressions are useful for discussing presentations and public speaking at a high level. Study the definitions and usage notes.
Examples
To pre-empt an objection — to address a potential counter-argument or difficult question before the audience has a chance to raise it.
This is a powerful persuasive technique. Introduce the point by saying something like, 'Now, you might be thinking...' or 'A common concern at this stage is...'.
To get bogged down in the weeds — to become overly focused on the minor, complex, or technical details of a topic, thereby losing sight of the main message.
This is often used as a self-correction to guide a presentation, e.g., 'Without getting too bogged down in the weeds, the key takeaway is...'. It's informal but very common in business contexts.
A cogent argument — a point or line of reasoning that is clear, logical, and highly convincing.
This is a formal and sophisticated collocation. It pairs well with verbs like 'to present', 'to formulate', or 'to put forward a cogent argument'.
To strike a chord with (the audience) — to say or do something that resonates deeply with listeners, evoking a strong emotional or intellectual response of agreement or sympathy.
This idiom emphasizes the connection with the listener, focusing on shared values or experiences rather than pure logic. For example, 'Her personal anecdote about overcoming adversity really struck a chord.'
To hold the floor — to be the person speaking and commanding the attention of the group, often for an extended period.
This can be neutral (describing the main speaker) or slightly negative if it implies someone is dominating the conversation and preventing others from speaking. Context is key.
4

Advanced presentation phrases

Effective presentations rely on powerful, natural-sounding language. How well do you know these advanced phrases?

Match the beginning of each sentence on the left with its correct ending on the right.

Drag or click to match
Definitions
5

Grammar: Inversion for emphasis

Grammar
Inversion involves reversing the standard subject-verb order to create emphasis, often in formal or rhetorical contexts. This advanced structure is particularly effective in persuasive presentations to make a statement more impactful or to highlight a crucial point. It signals a departure from neutral language, immediately capturing the audience's attention.
Examples
Rarely have we seen a market opportunity with such profound potential.
The negative adverbial 'rarely' is moved to the front, requiring the auxiliary verb 'have' to come before the subject 'we' for emphasis.
Not only does this strategy mitigate risk, but it also unlocks new revenue streams.
When a clause begins with 'not only', it is followed by an auxiliary verb and then the subject. The second clause follows the standard word order.
Under no circumstances should we delay this decision further.
Prepositional phrases with 'no' trigger inversion, creating a strong, formal prohibition or warning that is highly effective in a business pitch.
Key points
  • Use inversion in formal speeches and writing to add dramatic or rhetorical emphasis.
  • After the introductory negative or limiting adverbial, the auxiliary or modal verb comes before the subject.
  • A common error is forgetting to invert the subject and verb, e.g., 'Never I have heard...' instead of the correct 'Never have I heard...'
6

Fine-tuning your language

The following sentences are typical of advanced business communication but each contains one small mistake.

Find the single error in each sentence and correct it.

01Not until the final slide the presenter revealed the project's true cost.
Corrected version
Not until the final slide did the presenter revealed reveal the project's true cost.
02She presented a series of cogently arguments that won over the entire board.
Corrected version
She presented a series of cogently cogent arguments that won over the entire board.
03Had I knew about the technical issues, I would have prepared a backup demonstration.
Corrected version
Had I knew known about the technical issues, I would have prepared a backup demonstration.
04His personal anecdote about overcoming failure really struck a chord to the audience.
Corrected version
His personal anecdote about overcoming failure really struck a chord to with the audience.
05Rarely I have witnessed such a masterful handling of a hostile Q&A session.
Corrected version
Rarely I have I witnessed such a masterful handling of a hostile Q&A session.
06A skilled speaker will often pre-act common objections within the main body of their talk.
Corrected version
A skilled speaker will often pre-act pre-empt common objections within the main body of their talk.
07Let's not get bogged down on the weeds; we need to focus on the overarching strategy.
Corrected version
Let's not get bogged down on in the weeds; we need to focus on the overarching strategy.
7

The art of persuasive speaking

Read the passage about what makes a presentation truly effective.

Fill in each blank with the correct word or phrase from the word bank.

Word bank
A truly masterful presenter does more than simply convey information; they the audience, often using rhetorical flourishes to ensure their message will with listeners on an emotional level. While it's crucial to present a argument, one must avoid the trap of getting in the technical details. A key strategy is to any obvious objections before they are even raised, which demonstrates foresight and builds credibility. By doing so, the speaker can confidently and guide the conversation, ensuring their core message is received without unnecessary distraction.
8

Discuss these questions with a partner. Try to use vocabulary from the lesson.

  1. Considering different professional contexts, when is it more strategically sound to build a presentation around a powerful narrative designed to strike a chord, versus focusing on a meticulously cogent argument that aims to pre-empt every potential objection?
  2. Reflect on the public speaking styles valued in your culture's professional or political arenas. Is more weight given to a speaker who can hold the floor with powerful rhetoric, or to one who presents a concise, data-driven case without getting bogged down in the weeds? How does this affect what is perceived as persuasive?
  3. Suppose you're presenting a controversial idea and an influential stakeholder attempts to derail you by focusing on minute, technical details. How would you hold the floor and steer the conversation back to your main message, without getting bogged down in the weeds or appearing to dismiss their cogent points?